Randy Lajoie fails NASCAR drug test, suspended

NASCAR on Tuesday suspended former driver Randy LaJoie for failing a drug test, and he said he’s enrolled in a substance-abuse program.

LaJoie, who has not raced at any of NASCAR’s top three national levels since 2006, said in a statement that he smoked marijuana once in May.

“My use of marijuana was an isolated incident following the Coca-Cola 600,” he said. “I plan to follow the recommendations of the substance abuse counselor and suggestions of NASCAR and hope that someday I can prove to NASCAR and all the people with whom I associate that I have taken such steps to see that instances such as this do not reoccur.”

In an interview Tuesday on SIRIUS XM Radio, Lajoie said he has also been suspended from his role as a NASCAR analyst with ESPN.

ESPN confirmed Lajoie had been indefinitely suspended.

LaJoie was tested by NASCAR because he applied for a license on June 3 to become a spotter for one of Joe Gibbs Racing’s Nationwide Series teams. He said in his statement he voluntarily submitted to the test.

Lajoie raced in 44 races over 12 years in NASCAR’s elite Cup Series. His success was in the Nationwide Series, where he won 15 races over 19 seasons.

NASCAR toughened its drug testing policy before last season, and in May, 2009 suspended driver Jeremy Mayfield for failing a random drug test. He fought it through the court system, but a federal judge dismissed the case last month.

Via: sify.com

Lohan Urine Test: All Clear!

Another close call this past week has been cleared by Lindsay Lohan. Urine testing ordered after her SCRAM anklet went off, alerting the monitoring agencies that she had alcohol in her system, came back negative. The star, who has been wearing the monitoring device since May 24, insists that it was a false alarm due to someone spilling alcohol on her at the MTV movie awards after party. Now, she has lab results to back up her story. Get all the details, with pictures and video below!

Doubling her bail to $200,000 after the alarm, the judge has kept it there despite the contradictory analysis results. SCRAM officials say that their device would definitely be able to tell the difference between a spilled drink and consumed alcohol.

For Lindsay Lohan, urine testing had to be done quickly after the alarm went off. Sources say it happened the same night, but SCRAM officials say that the alcohol could have metabolized and left the system within a few hours. SCRAM rep Kathleen Brown told Access Hollywood in an email.

Via: law.rightpundits.com

Bald man wins police hair drug test appeal

A man who applied to join the police but was rejected because he did not have enough hair for a drugs test has successfully appealed against the decision.

It is understood he was at an advanced stage of the Police Service of Northern Ireland’s recruitment process when problems arose over the drug testing.

Because of his baldness, he could not give them hairs of up to 3cm in length.

He was also unable to provide about 200 body hairs as an alternative.

PSNI lawyers told the High Court in Belfast he would be reinstated in the recruitment process. Policies will also be changed to ensure other sources of DNA analysis are included.

The man, who has not been named for security reasons, launched judicial review proceedings following his unsuccessful attempt to become a trainee officer.

In his legal challenge, the would-be policeman claimed the decision was irrational and discriminatory.

As the case opened at the High Court on Wednesday, lawyers for the PSNI accepted he would have to be offered an alternative way of being tested.

The judge was told he would now be reinstated, and practices would be checked to ensure the same situation did not occur again.

Via: news.bbc.co.uk

Urine Test for Kidney Cancer a Step Closer to Development

ScienceDaily (Apr. 22, 2010) — Studying patients with kidney cancer, a team of researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis has identified a pair of proteins excreted in the urine that could lead to earlier and more accurate diagnosis of the disease.

The research, published online in the May issue of Mayo Clinic Proceedings, is the first to identify proteins secreted in urine that appear to accurately reveal the presence of about 90 percent of all kidney cancers.

Currently, there is no diagnostic test for kidney cancer. About 80 percent of kidney tumors are discovered incidentally, during a CT scan or ultrasound test that has been ordered for an unrelated abdominal complaint.

Kharasch and co-investigator Jeremiah J. Morrissey, PhD, looked at urine samples from 42 patients who became aware that they had kidney cancer during an abdominal imaging test and from 15 individuals who did not have cancer but were scheduled for surgery. Another 19 healthy volunteers were included who were not having surgery of any kind.

The researchers focused on two proteins that previously had been found in kidney tumors: aquaporin-1 (AQP1) and adipophilin (ADFP). They discovered large amounts of those proteins in urine samples from kidney cancer patients.

The AQP1 or ADFP proteins were not elevated in healthy individuals or surgery patients without cancer. The researchers also found that when the kidney tumors were removed, AQP1 and ADFP levels in the urine declined precipitously.

Kharasch, vice chancellor for research at Washington University, the Russell D. and Mary B. Shelden Professor of Anesthesiology and director of the Division of Clinical and Translational Research in the Department of Anesthesiology, has been working with lead author Morrissey, a research professor of anesthesiology, to detect kidney cancer at an earlier stage.

About 50,000 patients are diagnosed with kidney cancer each year. And about 13,000 people die from the disease annually in the United States alone. A test that could lead to earlier diagnosis could make a big dent in those numbers, according to Timothy J. Eberlein, MD, director of the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine.

Morrissey says further testing will be required to determine whether people with other types of kidney disease also have high levels of AQP1 and ADFP in their urine, too. But based upon their findings, Kharasch and Morrisey have filed a patent application through Washington University’s Office of Technology Management for use of aquaporin-1 and adipophilin to diagnose kidney cancer.

Because this study looked only at patients who already had a cancer diagnosis following an imaging test, Kharasch and Morrissey say more research will be needed to see how early in the disease process levels of the AQP1 or ADFP proteins rise and whether the concentration of those proteins in the urine might correspond to the size of a kidney tumor.

If the research continues to demonstrate that AQP1 and ADFP urine levels are good markers of kidney cancer, it may someday be possible for routine screening for the disease in a doctor’s office, using a noninvasive urine test to determine whether or not they have the disease.

Via: sciencedaily.com

New urine test spots prostate cancer

WASHINGTON – A urine test can help doctors better spot prostate cancer than either the current blood test or a rectal exam alone, U.S. researchers reported Tuesday.

They said Gen-Probe’s Progensa PCA3 test caught about half the actual cases of prostate cancer in men who had abnormal PSA levels or digital rectal exams, and had about a 20 percent “false positive” rate.

Trying to diagnose prostate cancer is one of the most maddening tasks a doctor has. The prostate is a walnut-shaped gland that produces semen and it is hard to get to.

Digital rectal exams can tell a specialist that the prostate is getting bigger, but that happens with normal aging as well as with cancer. A blood test for prostate specific antigen or PSA shows when PSA rises, but PSA goes up with either cancer or just normal enlargement of the prostate — or even if the gland is inflamed, such as from an infection.

Biopsies are difficult and painful to do and may take a portion of healthy prostate, missing any tumors entirely.

And prostate tumors can grow slowly. A study last year estimated that more than 1 million men in the United States alone had been needlessly treated for prostate tumors that likely would never have killed them.

The Progensa test looks for a genetic material called PCA3. It is a string of RNA that does not appear to have any function but that is overexpressed, or overactive, in prostate cancer.

Lightly touching the prostate can cause its release and it can then be detected in the urine using the test.

Crawford and colleagues tested Progensa in about 1,900 men who had high PSA readings, an abnormal digital rectal exam or both and who were scheduled to have biopsies. The test had a specificity of 78 percent, meaning that 78 percent of the men who had cancer indicated by the test actually did. This compares to just 21 percent for PSA alone, the researchers told a meeting of the American Urological Association in San Francisco.

The test had a sensitivity of 49 percent, meaning it correctly identified 49 percent of cancers. This is far less sensitive than PSA, which catches 87 percent of tumors, but if the two tests are used together they can help rule out the need for unnecessary surgery or radiation.

Among the 1,946 men studied, 42 percent turned out to have prostate cancer.

The test was approved for use in Europe in 2006 but is not yet approved in the United States.

Via: msnbc.msn.com